Sunday, October 20, 2019
Definition and Examples of Grimms Law
Definition and Examples of Grimm's Law Grimms Law is a statement of the relationship between certain consonants in Germanic languages and their originals in Indo-Europeanà [IE]. Also known as theà Germanic Consonant Shift, First Consonant Shift, First Germanic Sound Shift, and Rasks Rule. The basic principle of Grimms law was discovered early in the 19th century by Danish scholar Rasmus Rask, and soon afterward it was described in detail by German philologist Jacob Grimm. According to Millward and Hayes, Beginning sometime in the first millennium B.C. and perhaps continuing over several centuries, all the Indo-European stops underwent a complete transformation in Germanic (A Biography of the English Language, 2012).à In general, says Tom McArthur, Grimms Law holds that unvoiced IE stops became Germanic unvoiced continuants, that voiced IE stops became Germanic unvoiced stops, and that unvoiced IE continuants became Germanic voiced stops (Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language, 2005). Examples and Observations Rasks and Grimms work . . . succeeded in establishing once and for all that the Germanic languages are indeed part of Indo-European. Secondly, it did so by providing a brilliant account of the differences between Germanic and the classical languages in terms of a set of amazingly systematic sound changes.à (H. H. Hock and B. D. Joseph, Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship. Walter de Gruyter, 1996) A Chain Reaction Grimms Law can be considered a chain reaction: aspirated voice stops become regular voiced stops, voiced stops, in turn, become voiceless stops, and voiceless stops become fricatives...Examples of this change taking place at the beginning of words are provided [below]. . . . Sanskrit is the first form given (except for kanah which is Old Persian), Latin the second, and English the third. It is important to remember that the change takes place only once in a word: dhwer corresponds to door but the latter does not change to toor: Thus, Grimms Law distinguishes Germanic languages from languages such as Latin and Greek and modern Romance languages such as French and Spanish. . . . The change probably took place a little over 2,000 years ago.à (Elly van Gelderen, A History of the English Language. John Benjamins, 2006) bhrater-frater-brotherdhwer-foris-doorghordho-hortus-yard (Old English geard)pitr-pater-fathertu-tu-thoukrnga-cornu-hornkanab-cannabis-hemp (Old English henep)danta-dentis-toothjna-gnoscere-know/ken F or V? Grimms Law . . . explains why Germanic languages have f where other Indo-European languages have p. Compare English father, German vater (where v is pronounced f), Norwegian far, with Latin pater, Frenchà pà ¨re, Italian padre, Sanskrit pita.à (Simon Horobin,à How English Became English. Oxford University Press, 2016) A Sequence of Changes It remains unclear whether Grimms Law was in any sense a unitary natural sound change or a series of changes that need not have occurred together. It is true that no sound change can be shown to have occurred between any of the components of Grimms Law, but since Grimms Law was among the earliest Germanic sound changes, and since the other early changes that involved single non-laryngeal obstruents affected only the place of articulation and rounding of dorsals ... that could be an accident. In any case, Grimms Law is most naturally presented as a sequence of changes that counterfed each other.ââ¬â¹Ã (Donald Ringe, A Linguistic History of English: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford University Press, 2006)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.